From: | Michael Meskes <meskes(at)topsystem(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | phil(at)river-bank(dot)demon(dot)co(dot)uk (Phil Thompson) |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org (PostgreSQL Hacker) |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Decicision needed for connect statement |
Date: | 1998-05-08 08:34:40 |
Message-ID: | 199805080834.KAA10456@gauss.topsystem.de |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Phil Thompson writes:
> I use <server>:<port> as <SQL-server> and a separate SET SCHEMA <name>
> to set the database name as (I think) this is more consistent with
> SQL/2.
I don't think I like this:
12.3 <set schema statement>
Function
Set the default schema name for unqualified <schema qualified
name>s in <preparable statement>s that are prepared in the
current SQL-session by an <execute immediate statement> or a
<prepare statement> and in <direct SQL statement>s that are invoked
directly.
...
So it means I have to do the following to really connect:
exec sql connect to server;
exec sql set scheme template1;
This only makes sense IMO if we support different schemes over one
connection. but we don't do this, do we?
Michael
--
Dr. Michael Meskes, Project-Manager | topsystem Systemhaus GmbH
meskes(at)topsystem(dot)de | Europark A2, Adenauerstr. 20
meskes(at)debian(dot)org | 52146 Wuerselen
Go SF49ers! Go Rhein Fire! | Tel: (+49) 2405/4670-44
Use Debian GNU/Linux! | Fax: (+49) 2405/4670-10
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Meskes | 1998-05-08 08:35:42 | Re: [HACKERS] Decicision needed for connect statement |
Previous Message | Meskes, Michael | 1998-05-08 08:17:05 | RE: [HACKERS] Decicision needed for connect statement |