| From: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | olly(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk (Oliver Elphick) |
| Cc: | Olivier(dot)Caron(at)iut-gtr(dot)univ-artois(dot)fr, pgsql-questions(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [QUESTIONS] inheritance questions |
| Date: | 1998-05-07 14:35:33 |
| Message-ID: | 199805071435.KAA11451@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> I have previously suggested some syntax for specifying the inheritance
> of constraints more precisely. It looks as if there should also be a
> means of saying whether a descendant class should be included in
> operations on multiple rows - I don't think it should be a facility that
> operates automatically.
>
> Is any of the developers an expert on the inheritance features? or is
> this something that no-one has yet taken up?
This is the most complete specification of inheritance limitations I
have read, and plan to keep it for inclusion in the TODO list.
--
Bruce Momjian | 830 Blythe Avenue
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
+ If your life is a hard drive, | (610) 353-9879(w)
+ Christ can be your backup. | (610) 853-3000(h)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thomas G. Lockhart | 1998-05-07 14:45:58 | Re: on patch for close_ps() func. in geo_ops.c |
| Previous Message | Thomas G. Lockhart | 1998-05-07 13:33:16 | Broken source tree |