| From: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | sferac(at)proxy(dot)bazzanese(dot)com (Jose' Soares Da Silva) |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, pgsql-questions(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] LOCK TABLE statement |
| Date: | 1998-04-22 14:28:24 |
| Message-ID: | 199804221428.KAA24050@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>
>
> Hi, all
>
> Is the following sentence true ?
>
> * LOCK TABLE statement don't allows read access to locked tables by
> the other users.
> If another user try to SELECT a locked table, he must attend
> until the locked table is released.
>
> I have heard about another syntax of LOCK TABLE that allows read access
> to locked tables, on v6.3.2.
> Is it true or I've dream ?
No, perhaps in 6.4. However, any select from a table does it.
--
Bruce Momjian | 830 Blythe Avenue
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
+ If your life is a hard drive, | (610) 353-9879(w)
+ Christ can be your backup. | (610) 853-3000(h)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Gran Thyni | 1998-04-22 14:29:49 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: Proposal for async support in libpq |
| Previous Message | Tom Good | 1998-04-22 14:20:02 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [QUESTIONS] Configuration problems in PostgreSQL 6.3.2 on Linux-ELF |