Re: [HACKERS] HAVING clause and 6.3.2 release

>
> On Thu, 16 Apr 1998, Thomas G. Lockhart wrote:
>
> > > > My question is, "Do we disable the HAVING clause for 6.3.2?" The
> > > > bugs are serious and cause crashes.
> > > > Do we disable it?
> > > Yes...but disabling means that it *will not* be available until
> > > v6.4...no v6.3.3 :)
> >
> > Hmm. What is the downside to leaving it in with caveats or "stay away"
> > warnings in the release notes? Since it didn't exist as a feature
> > before, the only downside I see is somewhat increased traffic on the
> > questions list...
>
> I liked the one suggestion about having it as a compile time
> option until its fixed...

How about an elog(NOTICE,"...") so it runs, but they see the NOTICE
every time.

--
Bruce Momjian | 830 Blythe Avenue
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
+ If your life is a hard drive, | (610) 353-9879(w)
+ Christ can be your backup. | (610) 853-3000(h)