From: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us (Tom Lane) |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Anyone working on asynchronous NOTIFY reception? |
Date: | 1998-04-15 20:57:43 |
Message-ID: | 199804152057.QAA06328@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>
> Hi folks,
> Hope I'm not making a fool of myself by posting to a list I just
> joined ... but I couldn't find much about this in the list archives.
>
> I'm looking at an application that involves several client processes
> communicating in real time via a pgsql database. "Real time" means
> that when one client writes something, any other clients that are
> interested need to know about it within a few seconds at most.
> The other clients can use LISTEN/NOTIFY to detect updates --- but
> I don't think I can accept the notion of continuously doing empty
> queries to receive the notifies. That'll drive performance into the
> ground. What I want is for a client to be able to sleep until
> something interesting happens.
The person who knows the most about this is:
dz(at)cs(dot)unitn(dot)it (Massimo Dal Zotto)
--
Bruce Momjian | 830 Blythe Avenue
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
+ If your life is a hard drive, | (610) 353-9879(w)
+ Christ can be your backup. | (610) 853-3000(h)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Brett McCormick | 1998-04-15 21:28:44 | Re: [HACKERS] Anyone working on asynchronous NOTIFY reception? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 1998-04-15 20:25:36 | Anyone working on asynchronous NOTIFY reception? |