From: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | meskes(at)topsystem(dot)de (Michael Meskes) |
Cc: | dg(at)illustra(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: PostgreSQL reference manual |
Date: | 1998-03-25 14:54:54 |
Message-ID: | 199803251454.JAA07503@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>
> David Gould writes:
> > Consider also not updateing the grammar. The strength of PostgreSQL is that
> > functions can be added to work inside the server. These functions can often
> > do whatever is being proposed as new syntax.
>
> So you want me to not check the syntax while parsing the embedded SQL code?
What I think we was suggesting is that we add non-ANSI functionality as
function calls rather than grammer changes with keywords. The only
disadvantage is that it is a little more cumbersom, and less intuitive
for users.
--
Bruce Momjian | 830 Blythe Avenue
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
+ If your life is a hard drive, | (610) 353-9879(w)
+ Christ can be your backup. | (610) 853-3000(h)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Zeugswetter Andreas | 1998-03-25 15:28:25 | AW: [HACKERS] Begin statement again |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 1998-03-25 14:52:19 | Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: PostgreSQL reference manual |