| From: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | martin(at)biochemistry(dot)ucl(dot)ac(dot)uk |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] varchar() vs char16 performance |
| Date: | 1998-03-12 14:07:35 |
| Message-ID: | 199803121407.JAA17163@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> If char2 et al are going completely from 6.4, I think it would be sensible
> for pg_dump to filter these types and change them to char(2) et al when
> it writes the CREATE statments.
>
That is an interesting idea, but what about applications that use them?
I think we can have the parser change them for one release, then drop
them completely.
--
Bruce Momjian | 830 Blythe Avenue
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
+ If your life is a hard drive, | (610) 353-9879(w)
+ Christ can be your backup. | (610) 853-3000(h)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 1998-03-12 14:10:57 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [QUESTIONS] Does Storage Manager support >2GB tables? |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 1998-03-12 13:48:44 | Re: AW: AW: [HACKERS] attlen weirdness? |