Re: [HACKERS] spin locks

From: Massimo Dal Zotto <dz(at)cs(dot)unitn(dot)it>
To: maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us (Bruce Momjian)
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] spin locks
Date: 1998-02-16 22:33:00
Message-ID: 199802162233.XAA06712@tango.cs.unitn.it
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>
> >
> > Folks,
> >
> > On the spin lock and multiple CPU's, this should not be
> > a compile time issue, but a runtime issue. What do you
> > think?
> >
> > Jordan Henderson
> >
> >
> >
>
> Yes.

Yes, if we have the tprintf patch we can also add an option flag and change
it un the fly while the backends are running.

--
Massimo Dal Zotto

+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Massimo Dal Zotto e-mail: dz(at)cs(dot)unitn(dot)it |
| Via Marconi, 141 phone: ++39-461-534251 |
| 38057 Pergine Valsugana (TN) www: http://www.cs.unitn.it/~dz/ |
| Italy pgp: finger dz(at)tango(dot)cs(dot)unitn(dot)it |
+----------------------------------------------------------------------+

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Brett McCormick 1998-02-16 23:56:15 mkoidname(opaque, opaque)
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 1998-02-16 20:50:52 Re: [HACKERS] spin locks