Re: [HACKERS] Valid ports for v6.3

In message <34E5CE64(dot)BA99E3D0(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>, "Thomas G. Lockhart" writes:
> Here is my current list for porting status for the v6.3 release. I may
> have missed at least a few reports, e.g hpux, irix??
>
> Since the porting support has changed for v6.3, if a system is not
> tested it should be assumed to be broken. Any regression test done since
> Feb 1 will count as "confirmed working", as long as the test ran to
> completion and for the most part behaved properly.
>
> Any machine which does not get an installation and a regression test for
> v6.3beta will move to the unsupported list. Also, let us know if you
> have an interest in a port even though you cannot actually do the work
> to confirm it; that may encourage someone else to volunteer.
>
> Marc/Bruce, can you help me clarify the bsdi/freebsd/netbsd/bsdxxx
> entries? I'm not sure which are unique and what the names should be...
>
> - Tom
>
> * aix/4.1.4.0-4.2 - confirmed working when built on 4.1.4.0 (Darren
> King)
> _ aix/3.5 - not yet tested? close enough to 4.1 to count?? (Frank
> Dana?)
> _ bsdi
> _ FreeBSD/2.2.1,2.2.5 - in progress (Tatsuo)
> ? NetBSD/i386 version? - not yet tested but should work?
> x NetBSD/m68k Amiga, HP300, Mac - not yet working... (Henry Hotz)
> * NetBSD/sparc version? confirmed working (Tom Helbekkmo)
> * NetBSD/vax version? confirmed working (Tom Helbekkmo)
> * dgux/5.4R4.11 - patches submitted (Brian Gallew)
> _ hpux/9.0.x
> _ hpux/10.20
> _ irix5
> _ irix6/MIPS
> _ dec/alpha - currently broken? confirmed working on v6.2.1 (Pedro)
> _ linux/alpha - currently broken?
> * linux/i386 - confirmed working (Thomas)
> ? linux/i386/glibc2 - minor library breakage; in progress (Oliver)
> _ mklinux/ppc - in progress (Tatsuo)
> _ nextstep - worked with patches on v1.0.9; not working now?
> _ sco/i386
> _ solaris/i386 - confirmed working (Marc)
> * solaris/sparc/2.5.1 - confirmed working (Marc)
> _ solaris/sparc/2.6 - in progress (Tatsuo)
> _ sunos/sparc/4.1.4 - in progress (Tatsuo)
> _ svr4/MIPS - dcosx and sinix/seimens-nixdorf worked on v6.1 (Frank
> Ridderbusch?)
> _ ultrix4 - no recent reports? obsolete port??
> x univel - not working now; in progress? (Billy G. Allie)
>
>

I don't see linux/sparc here. The last snapshot I tried was from 2/6.
That ran well. I just grapped today's (2/14) snapshot and will try that,
and let you know. I'm using 2.0.29 kernel.

One issue I've heard of is that _SC_OPEN_MAX is used in
backend/storage/file/fd.c. I later kernels, /usr/include/asm/unistd.h
was changed. _SC_OPEN_MAX has #ifdef __KERNEL__ around it. 2.0.29
doesn't have the #ifdef, so I don't have this issue.

I'm not what the correct fix should be.

Tom Szybist
szybist(at)boxhill(dot)com