From: | t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)hub(dot)org |
Cc: | t-ishii(at)srapc451(dot)sra(dot)co(dot)jp |
Subject: | MB patch |
Date: | 1998-02-12 02:10:58 |
Message-ID: | 199802120210.LAA25924@srapc451.sra.co.jp |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hello,
I have made patches that allow PostgreSQL to handle multi-byte
characters. The patches makes most commands including "regexp" and
"like" 8 bit, multi-byte aware. You have a choice of one of followings
for coding schema at the compile time:
1. single byte 7 bit ASCII/8 bit characters(mostly used in Europ)
2. EUC (extend Unix Code) for Japanese, Chinese and Korean
3. UNICODE (UTF-8)
4. Mule internal code
I only modified include/regexp, backend/regex and
backend/utils/adt/like.c. So the patches would not affect other parts
of PostgreSQL, I believe.
Note that I changed regexp coming with PostgreSQL rather than
borrowing GNU's regex to avoid license issues.
Should I post the patches for 6.3b now or wait after v6.3?
--
Tatsuo Ishii
t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thomas G. Lockhart | 1998-02-12 02:31:28 | Re: [HACKERS] compiling extension functions? (fwd) |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 1998-02-12 01:37:42 | Re: [HACKERS] PostGreSQL v6.2.1 for Linux Alpha |