Re: [HACKERS] Profile of current backend

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: meskes(at)topsystem(dot)de (Michael Meskes)
Cc: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Profile of current backend
Date: 1998-02-10 15:40:51
Message-ID: 199802101540.KAA09228@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>
> The Hermit Hacker writes:
> > Just curious, but do you have -F set to disable fsync()? We
> > really really should disable that by default :(
>
> I tried with -F and it runs nicely. No difference to see between PostgreSQL
> and Oracle. I just ran another test which includes table creation, inserts
> and drop (source follows). Here's the result:
>
> Oracle 7.3.3.4.0:
> I needed 21 seconds and -345682 microseconds for this test
>
> PostgreSQL without -F:
> I needed 152 seconds and -623545 microseconds for this test
>
> PostgreSQL with -F:
> I needed 5 seconds and 84411 microseconds for this test
>
> Whow!
>

This is good news. Is this with 6.3 or 6.2.1?

--
Bruce Momjian
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Meskes, Michael 1998-02-10 15:53:22 RE: [HACKERS] Profile of current backend
Previous Message Thomas G. Lockhart 1998-02-10 15:24:53 Re: [HACKERS] Profile of current backend