| From: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu (Thomas G(dot) Lockhart) |
| Cc: | Andreas(dot)Zeugswetter(at)telecom(dot)at, pgsql-hackers(at)hub(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: atttypmod of 0 |
| Date: | 1998-02-07 02:11:47 |
| Message-ID: | 199802070211.VAA05245@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>
> > > Yes, I think to change atttypmod to default to -1 would be the right
> > > thing,
> > > since the empty string '' really has a length of 0,
> > > We could think of -1 as: We don't know how long this field will be.
> > > 0 would mean the field has 0 bytes.
> >
> > Do people want atttypmod at -1 at this time? It will require a
> > dump/reload.
>
> If it fixes problems, now is the time :)
Well, right now, since it is not being used from anything by char() and
varchar(), it is not a problem. But it will have to be changed when we
use it for other types.
So do we change it now?
--
Bruce Momjian
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thomas G. Lockhart | 1998-02-07 02:18:27 | Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: atttypmod of 0 |
| Previous Message | Thomas G. Lockhart | 1998-02-07 01:54:51 | Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: atttypmod of 0 |