Re: [HACKERS] Re: [QUESTIONS] MySQL benchmark page

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org (The Hermit Hacker)
Cc: herouth(at)oumail(dot)openu(dot)ac(dot)il, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [QUESTIONS] MySQL benchmark page
Date: 1998-02-03 19:30:09
Message-ID: 199802031930.OAA21892@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> > This is correct. Vacuum is fast, vacuum analyze is pretty slow. We
> > could separate them, I guess, and that would eliminate the write-lock
> > and be only a readlock.
>
> Possible to slip it in for v6.3? Would make it so that an analyze
> could be done nightly, to keep statistics up, and then a vacuum once a
> week or so just for garbage collection...?

When I added analyze, I did not understand the issues, so I was able to
work from Vadim's code in vacuum. I put it on the TODO list. Don't
know if it can make 6.3. I am working on cleaning up the cacheoffset
code right now.

--
Bruce Momjian
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message The Hermit Hacker 1998-02-03 19:30:57 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [QUESTIONS] MySQL benchmark page
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 1998-02-03 19:28:26 Re: [HACKERS] VACUUM ANALYZE Problem