Re: [HACKERS] Variable block size...

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: darrenk(at)insightdist(dot)com (Darren King)
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Variable block size...
Date: 1998-02-02 17:13:04
Message-ID: 199802021713.MAA13364@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>
> > > > Looks like this variable size stuff will be the first new feature
> > > > for 6.4 then, eh? :)
> > >
> > > What is the chance of having this ready by Friday? Still would
> > > give us 3weeks of debugging...
> >
> > Well, it's OK to leave _one_ feature for v6.4. Bruce is probably tired of typing
> > the feature list :)
> >
> > Also, we still have a few loose ends for v6.3. But, I'll bet Darren's stuff can
> > go in and not affect anything if we run using the current block size.
>
> Great chance of having it by Friday if not sooner. I'll get on it tonite.
>
> Wasn't sure where the line in the sand was for "adding features" vs "fixing bugs."

I think Marc is getting softer on this issue. [Ducks head]

--
Bruce Momjian
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas G. Lockhart 1998-02-02 17:42:08 Re: [HACKERS] (: JDBC+(Sun ~3:pm MST) CVS :) -also question about regression tests
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 1998-02-02 17:12:01 Re: [HACKERS] subquery syntax broken