Re: [BUGS] postgresql-6.1.1: wrong roll-back'ing "drop table" query.

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: ic(at)cms(dot)spb(dot)su (Ivan Crivoruchko)
Cc: hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org (PostgreSQL-development)
Subject: Re: [BUGS] postgresql-6.1.1: wrong roll-back'ing "drop table" query.
Date: 1998-01-11 21:35:41
Message-ID: 199801112135.QAA12754@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Drop table is not a transaction-able operation. This is expected
behavior.

> [ic(at)cms PGconi]$ createdb bugexample
> [ic(at)cms PGconi]$ psql bugexample
> Welcome to the POSTGRESQL interactive sql monitor:
> Please read the file COPYRIGHT for copyright terms of POSTGRESQL
>
> type \? for help on slash commands
> type \q to quit
> type \g or terminate with semicolon to execute query
> You are currently connected to the database: bugexample
>
> bugexample=> create table foobar ( x int );
> CREATE
> bugexample=> insert into foobar values (1);
> INSERT 3035918
> bugexample=> insert into foobar values (2);
> INSERT 3035919
> bugexample=> \d
>
> Database = bugexample
> +------------------+----------------------------------+----------+
> | Owner | Relation | Type |
> +------------------+----------------------------------+----------+
> | ic | foobar | table |
> +------------------+----------------------------------+----------+
> bugexample=> select * from foobar;
> x
> -
> 1
> 2
> (2 rows)
>
> bugexample=> begin;
> BEGIN
> bugexample=> drop table foobar;
> DROP
> bugexample=> abort;
> ABORT
> bugexample=> select * from foobar;
> x
> -
> (0 rows)
>
> bugexample=>
>
>
> If you know how this problem might be fixed, list the solution below:
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> ?
>
>
>
> ic
>
> P.S. Sorry for my bad english grammatic ... :-(
>
>

--
Bruce Momjian
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1998-01-11 21:39:09 [BUGS] NOTICE:AbortTransaction and not in in-progress state (fwd)
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 1998-01-11 21:34:44 Re: [BUGS] postgresql-6.1.1: losing "distinct" in "create view XXX as select distinct ...".