Re: WIN1252 encoding - backend or not?

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Now, if I don't understand the patch, we can change the procedure so I
> require someone to state it is OK rather than the fallback of quiet
> acceptance, especially just before a beta or RC version.

I am not suggesting that we need to tighten up during devel cycle,
and maybe not during early beta. But once we approach RC I think
we need a tighter process. We really want a "get it right the first
time" mentality to apply at this point, whereas during development
there's always time to catch problems later.

> Also, because the bad patch got in there is a temptation to believe our
> process is flawed,

Don't forget you applied *two* very questionable patches on Thursday.
Had it been only one I'm not sure there'd be this degree of unhappiness.

regards, tom lane