Re: Stats for inheritance trees

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: decibel <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Stats for inheritance trees
Date: 2010-01-06 15:03:28
Message-ID: 1991.1262790208@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

decibel <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org> writes:
> On Dec 29, 2009, at 6:29 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> * when a tabstat message comes in, increment changes_since_analyze by
>> the sum of t_tuples_inserted + t_tuples_updated + t_tuples_deleted;
>>
>> * when an analyze report message comes in, reset changes_since_analyze
>> to zero.

> If that's being added, could we extend the concept to also keep a reltuples_delta column (name suggestions welcome!) that is = reltuples_delta + t_tuples_inserted - t_tuples_deleted, and then set reltuples_delta back to 0 after an analyze (or anything else that would reset reltuples)? That means you could use reltuples + reltuples_delta as a fairly accurate row count.

We already have a fairly accurate row count.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2010-01-06 15:05:52 Re: Status of plperl inter-sp calling
Previous Message Zdenek Kotala 2010-01-06 15:00:56 Re: pg_migrator issues