From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Cédric Villemain <cedric(dot)villemain(dot)debian(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, Florian Helmberger <fh(at)25th-floor(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [ADMIN] pg_class reltuples/relpages not updated by autovacuum/vacuum |
Date: | 2011-05-29 14:40:27 |
Message-ID: | 19876.1306680027@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-hackers |
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?C=E9dric_Villemain?= <cedric(dot)villemain(dot)debian(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> 2011/5/29 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>:
>> OK, do you like the attached version of that logic? (Other fragments
>> of the patch as before.)
> The idea was that remove only one page from the VACUUM will prevent
> relfrozenxid update and reltuples (and relpages) update.
> Now, I beleive that once we've skip at least one page thanks to
> SKIP_PAGES_THRESHOLD, then we should be more agressive and remove as
> many as possible pages from the VACUUM, tks to the VM.
That would require proof, not just suggestion. Skipping pages will
defeat the OS read-ahead algorithm, and so could easily cost more than
reading them.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Pavan Deolasee | 2011-05-29 15:48:42 | Re: [ADMIN] pg_class reltuples/relpages not updated by autovacuum/vacuum |
Previous Message | Cédric Villemain | 2011-05-29 08:40:28 | Re: [ADMIN] pg_class reltuples/relpages not updated by autovacuum/vacuum |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Josh Kupershmidt | 2011-05-29 14:56:02 | Re: pg_terminate_backend and pg_cancel_backend by not administrator user |
Previous Message | Noah Misch | 2011-05-29 09:47:53 | Re: pg_upgrade automatic testing |