From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
Cc: | Lars Kanis <kanis(at)comcard(dot)de>, "pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: BUG #4869: No proper initialization of OpenSSL-Engine in libpq |
Date: | 2009-06-22 16:34:48 |
Message-ID: | 19871.1245688488@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
> On 22 jun 2009, at 17.46, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> It seems like there is large potential for failure in
>> contexts other than the one or two you are going to be able to test
>> right now. Is there anything that can be done to reduce the risk?
> I share your concerns in general. But I think we nee to take into
> account that this simply does not work without the patch.
Frankly, I don't much care whether openssl-with-an-external-engine
works; we never supported that before, and if it doesn't work now,
that's not a regression. What I'm worried about at this stage of the
release cycle is regressions, eg, does the code still compile at all
with openssl version 0.9.random-version-that-used-to-work.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2009-06-22 16:37:24 | Re: BUG #4862: different results in to_date() between 8.3.7 & 8.4.RC1 |
Previous Message | Brendan Jurd | 2009-06-22 16:28:49 | Re: BUG #4862: different results in to_date() between 8.3.7 & 8.4.RC1 |