Re: portability of "designated initializers"

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: portability of "designated initializers"
Date: 2008-11-23 04:03:01
Message-ID: 19848.1227412981@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> I've already modified your patch a bit ... please send your updated
> patch so I can merge it into mine. However, my changes were also
> relatively minor. Since Tom wants it to be entirely rewritten then
> maybe merging minor fixes to it is a waste of time ...

The thing I'm complaining about is having dropped the intermediate
struct that represents the fully decoded set of reloptions. If you
put that back I won't object to a table-driven approach to doing the
decoding.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andreas Kretschmer 2008-11-23 09:05:33 Re: [Q]updating multiple rows with Different values
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2008-11-23 03:43:22 Re: portability of "designated initializers"