| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Zeugswetter Andreas" <andreas(dot)zeugswetter(at)telecom(dot)at> |
| Cc: | "'hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: AW: [HACKERS] shared lib names |
| Date: | 1999-07-17 15:32:46 |
| Message-ID: | 19816.932225566@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Zeugswetter Andreas" <andreas(dot)zeugswetter(at)telecom(dot)at> writes:
>> What? They should all have the "lib" AFAIK --- dynamic loading takes
>> the same kind of shared lib as a regular link does on every platform
>> I've heard about.
> We are only talking about the naming convention here.
> e.g. libpq.so but plpgsql.so
Oh, right, I see your point. plpgsql.so isn't intended to ever be
statically linked so it needn't obey the "lib" naming convention.
Never mind ... ;-)
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 1999-07-17 15:38:43 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: include-file cleanup |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 1999-07-17 15:21:47 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: include-file cleanup |