Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Update of bitmask type

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Adriaan Joubert <a(dot)joubert(at)albourne(dot)com>
Cc: Postgresql <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Update of bitmask type
Date: 1999-11-30 06:40:19
Message-ID: 19773.943944019@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Adriaan Joubert <a(dot)joubert(at)albourne(dot)com> writes:
> When BIT and BIT VARYING are properly integrated, do I need to do
> something about regression tests?

Please do contribute a regression test for them. We always need
more regression tests ...

regards, tom lane

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hiroshi Inoue 1999-11-30 08:17:59 RE: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] drop/rename table and transactions
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 1999-11-30 06:33:48 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Update of bitmask type