| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, David Blewett <david(at)dawninglight(dot)net>, "pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: List Message Footer |
| Date: | 2009-03-18 03:40:14 |
| Message-ID: | 1977.1237347614@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>> But, the question is: why? and not just to you, but Tom/Magnus/Alvarre
>> ... I'm not advocating for, I'm just curious why ppl are against ...
> Yea, I should have stated that. I think the footer is full enough and I
> just don't see enough demand for URL lookups to warrant it.
Same here. The information is already provided; we don't need to
duplicate it in the footer. I'm not impressed by the argument that
some folks' mail programs won't dig it out of the headers --- I think
it's about as likely that they won't dig a URL out of a standard footer
either.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2009-03-18 03:54:32 | Re: List Message Footer |
| Previous Message | Tatsuo Ishii | 2009-03-18 03:33:16 | Re: List Message Footer |