| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SD <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at>, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: column ordering, was Re: [PATCHES] Enums patch v2 |
| Date: | 2006-12-21 15:50:59 |
| Message-ID: | 19759.1166716259@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> writes:
> The thing is, physical index numbers has meaning, the logical index
> number does not. In a view definition we're going to store the physical
> index, not the logical one, for example.
Really? To me that's one of a large number of questions that are
unresolved about how we'd do this. You can make a case for either
choice in quite a number of places.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2006-12-21 15:52:46 | Re: ERROR: tuple concurrently updated |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-12-21 15:47:52 | Re: New version of money type |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SD | 2006-12-21 16:06:53 | Re: column ordering, was Re: [PATCHES] Enums patch v2 |
| Previous Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2006-12-21 15:37:03 | Re: column ordering, was Re: [PATCHES] Enums patch v2 |