Re: message clarifications

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: message clarifications
Date: 2010-04-06 13:57:37
Message-ID: 19753.1270562257@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> On tis, 2010-04-06 at 10:30 +0100, Simon Riggs wrote:
>> These are all DEBUG messages. Can you explain "marked differently" so I
>> can do that for you?

> Then it would be better to convert them to use elog() instead of
> ereport().

Or use errmsg_internal instead of errmsg.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2010-04-06 14:11:08 Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Check compulsory parameters in recovery.conf in standby_mode, per
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2010-04-06 13:15:53 Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Check compulsory parameters in recovery.conf in standby_mode, per