From: | Christine Penner <christine(at)ingenioussoftware(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Postgres-General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Error installing Postgres |
Date: | 2009-04-22 17:31:32 |
Message-ID: | 19740415012840.E64B2A20341C1CAA@priv-edtnaa07.telusplanet.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Windows XP pro. I went to the postgres web site, downloads, clicked
on the binary package and selected windows. It gave me a file called
Postgresql-8.3.7-1-windows.exe
When I run that I hit next for the postgres directory, then after
hitting next for the data directory I get the error. I kept all
defaults for directories because I want to keep my existing data etc.
Christine
At 10:24 AM 22/04/2009, you wrote:
>On Wed, 2009-04-22 at 10:13 -0700, Christine Penner wrote:
> > I am upgrading from 8.3.4 to 8.3.7. That's why I'm confused. The
> > notes said I wouldn't have to do that. 8.3.4 was the original install.
>
>What OS are you running? How did you go about upgrading?
>
>Debian/Ubuntu will use --integer-datetimes by default. If the machine
>was once compiled from source you could see the problem.
>
>RedHat/Cent/Fedora has long used the incorrect default of floating based
>timestamps. If you downloaded the wrong package from pgsqlrpms then you
>could run into the error (pgsqlrpms has both --integer-datetimes and
>floating based packages (for compatibility).
>
>Joshua D. Drake
>
>--
>PostgreSQL - XMPP: jdrake(at)jabber(dot)postgresql(dot)org
> Consulting, Development, Support, Training
> 503-667-4564 - http://www.commandprompt.com/
> The PostgreSQL Company, serving since 1997
>
>
>--
>Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org)
>To make changes to your subscription:
>http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joao Ferreira | 2009-04-22 17:34:25 | Re: Testing ... please reply |
Previous Message | Raymond O'Donnell | 2009-04-22 17:28:08 | Re: Testing ... please reply |