From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>, Anastasia Lubennikova <a(dot)lubennikova(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
Subject: | Re: pg_constraint.conincluding is useless |
Date: | 2018-09-07 20:12:59 |
Message-ID: | 19735.1536351179@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> On Sun, Sep 2, 2018 at 01:27:25PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> If we do do a bump for beta4, I'd be strongly tempted to address the
>> lack of a unique index for pg_constraint as well, cf
>> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/10110.1535907645@sss.pgh.pa.us
> Uh, if we add a unique index later, wouldn't that potentially cause
> future restores to fail? Seems we better add it now.
Yup, done already.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2018-09-07 20:52:19 | Re: pgsql: Allow extensions to install built as well as unbuilt headers. |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2018-09-07 20:12:29 | Re: A strange GiST error message or fillfactor of GiST build |