| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>, Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater(at)gmx(dot)net>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: No Issue Tracker - Say it Ain't So! |
| Date: | 2015-09-24 22:40:28 |
| Message-ID: | 19718.1443134428@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
> On 09/24/2015 12:55 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I agree with the idea that we don't yet want to give the impression that
>> this is the official bug tracker. However, "beta-bugs" could give the
>> impression that it was specifically for bugs about 9.5beta, without
>> dispelling the idea that it is official. Maybe "bugs-test.p.o"?
> I'd suggest instead just having a big banner up in the page header which
> says "this system is currently beta and not yet the canonical source for
> postgres bug information". That way, if it does become the canonical
> source, we won't go breaking everyone's links when we change the domain
> name.
Works for me, if it's not too hard to do.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2015-09-24 22:53:12 | Re: Decimal64 and Decimal128 |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2015-09-24 22:38:08 | Re: Bad row estimation with indexed func returning bool |