Re: more on initdb

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: more on initdb
Date: 2003-10-06 04:50:19
Message-ID: 19711.1065415819@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> Is there any reason other than historical that the System Views setup
> isn't a separate script fed to postgres by initdb, like, say, the
> information schema file? If there isn't a good reason should we unwire
> it as part of moving to a C version of initdb?

Just historical, and go for it.

regards, tom lane

PS: please don't send stuff bcc to pgsql-hackers. I was fortunate to
notice this in my probable-spam folder before deleting it ...

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2003-10-06 05:48:08 extra_float_digits question
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-10-06 03:48:26 Re: Open 7.4 items