Re: Partitioning option for COPY

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Jan Urbański <wulczer(at)wulczer(dot)org>
Cc: Emmanuel Cecchet <manu(at)frogthinker(dot)org>, Emmanuel Cecchet <manu(at)asterdata(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Partitioning option for COPY
Date: 2009-11-20 23:40:53
Message-ID: 19669.1258760453@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

=?UTF-8?B?SmFuIFVyYmHFhHNraQ==?= <wulczer(at)wulczer(dot)org> writes:
> that got broken by the WHEN triggers patch
> (c6e0a36243a54eff79b47b3a0cb119fb67a55165), which changed the
> TriggerEnabled function signature, the code currently does not compile.

[ squint... ] What is that patch doing touching the innards of
trigger.c in the first place? I can't see any reason for trigger.c
to be associated with partitioning.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-11-20 23:47:35 Re: DEFAULT of domain ignored in plpgsql (8.4.1)
Previous Message Jan Urbański 2009-11-20 23:22:33 Re: Partitioning option for COPY