From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Karel Zak <zakkr(at)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: freefuncs.c is never called from anywhere!? |
Date: | 2000-06-09 17:34:43 |
Message-ID: | 19665.960572083@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Karel Zak <zakkr(at)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz> writes:
>> IIRC, some people were concerned about the fact that freeObject()
>> couldn't possibly cope with circular structures, multiply-linked
>> subexpressions, etc. I don't think that's a problem for my intended
>> use in the relcache --- the only structures I'll be freeing are ones
>> previously read in by the node-reading functions, and those aren't
>> going to have any surprises like that.
> IMHO use separate memory context will better and more fast way than
> freeObject().
A separate memory context for each relcache entry? I don't think so...
contexts aren't likely to be *that* cheap. Especially since I'd
probably need at least two contexts per relcache entry in order to do it
that way.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2000-06-09 17:40:20 | Re: freefuncs.c is never called from anywhere!?] |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-06-09 17:33:28 | Re: libpq problems in CVS |