| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | teg(at)redhat(dot)com (Trond Eivind =?iso-8859-1?q?Glomsr=F8d?=) |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: autoconf + newer gcc barfs |
| Date: | 2002-01-24 19:53:37 |
| Message-ID: | 19664.1011902017@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
teg(at)redhat(dot)com (Trond Eivind =?iso-8859-1?q?Glomsr=F8d?=) writes:
> GCC CVS now outputs a multiline version string:
> [teg(at)halden teg]$ gcc --version
> gcc (GCC) 3.1 20020115 (Red Hat Linux Rawhide 3.1-0.18)
> Copyright (C) 2002 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
> warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
I put in a "head -1" step per your suggestion. However, this will still
leave us with really ugly version strings, along the line of
PostgreSQL 7.2rc1 on hppa-hp-hpux10.20, compiled by GCC gcc (GCC) 3.1 20020115 (Red Hat Linux Rawhide 3.1-0.18)
May I suggest that gcc is being a little too verbose here? Perhaps
"gcc --version --verbose" could do that, and plain "gcc --version"
could try to have some respect for compatibility with prior behavior.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-01-24 19:56:10 | Re: C++ problems with RC1 |
| Previous Message | Bill Studenmund | 2002-01-24 19:50:12 | Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects |