"Thomas" <thhal(at)mailblocks(dot)com> writes:
> The hash_seq_search keeps track of what element that it should return next
> in a HASH_SEQ_STATUS struct when it peruses a bucket. Removing that element
> from the table won't change anything since the struct remains unaffected. It
> still holds onto that element and hence, will return it on next iteration.
This isn't a bug; it's the designed way for it to work. It's up to
callers to avoid causing a problem.
regards, tom lane