| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Sullivan <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: pg_ctl -m fast failing? |
| Date: | 2003-03-05 16:00:08 |
| Message-ID: | 19648.1046880008@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Andrew Sullivan <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info> writes:
> On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 05:52:15PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
>>> ... the second stop would fail? Am I understanding correctly?
>>> Because that's the behavior I am observing.
>>
>> No, I'd not expect the second stop to fail; and I can't reproduce any
>> such problem here.
> Right. This is the occasional problem that I have been trying, in
> vain, to reproduce lately. Indeed, if I get it into the right state,
> "-m i" will issue complaints as well. But darned if I can make it
> happen again :-(
Hm, so a start immediately followed by a stop sometimes fails? Is the
stop issued too quickly to allow any clients to get in?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Alberer | 2003-03-05 16:02:42 | Difficult query |
| Previous Message | scott.marlowe | 2003-03-05 15:47:36 | Re: Help me! |