From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Nigel J(dot) Andrews" <nandrews(at)investsystems(dot)co(dot)uk> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Freeing plan memory |
Date: | 2002-10-19 17:38:39 |
Message-ID: | 19636.1035049119@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Nigel J. Andrews" <nandrews(at)investsystems(dot)co(dot)uk> writes:
> On Sat, 19 Oct 2002, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I'm not sure where the leak is in your plpython example, but I'd be
>> inclined to look to plpython itself, perhaps even just the string
>> concatenation expression in
>> plan = plpy.prepare("SELECT " + repr(a))
> Well it's not that string operation.
Actually, I'll bet it's this code in PLy_spi_prepare:
plan->plan = SPI_prepare(query, plan->nargs, plan->types);
// error check
plan->plan = SPI_saveplan(plan->plan);
// error check
The copy of the plan that's returned by SPI_prepare is being blithely
lost --- and since it's in the procCxt, it won't go away until the
plpython function is exited. Need a SPI_freeplan() here, I think.
Can you check it out and send a patch?
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2002-10-19 18:14:56 | Re: [HACKERS] clusterdb has poor error recovery |
Previous Message | Nigel J. Andrews | 2002-10-19 17:27:23 | Re: Freeing plan memory |