Re: commit_delay, siblings

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: commit_delay, siblings
Date: 2005-06-22 17:35:43
Message-ID: 19608.1119461743@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
> I've been trying to get a test result for 8.1 that shows that we can eliminate
> commit_delay and commit_siblings, as I believe that these settings no longer
> have any real effect on performance.

I don't think they ever did :-(. The theory is good, but useful values
for commit_delay would probably be under a millisecond, and there isn't
any portable way to sleep for such short periods. We've been leaving
them there just in case somebody can find a use for 'em, but I wouldn't
object to taking them out.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-06-22 17:47:57 Re: table and column information from cursor?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-06-22 16:52:39 Re: Problem with dblink regression test