| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jeff Boes <jboes(at)nexcerpt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Contents of pg_listener linger? |
| Date: | 2004-02-06 15:44:48 |
| Message-ID: | 196.1076082288@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin |
Jeff Boes <jboes(at)nexcerpt(dot)com> writes:
> What causes the contents of pg_listener to "linger" long past the lifespan of
> the associated database backend? My table has rows that I know must be days old.
PG version?
I have a vague recollection of old bugs that prevented pg_listener rows
from being scavenged during backend exit, but they're all gone AFAIK.
The only remaining condition that would account for this is a crash of
the listening backend, but I trust that's not what you're dealing with.
In any case, if there is a row for a dead backend it should be removed
the first time someone tries to "notify" that condition name and
discovers that he can't signal the dead backend. If you've got days-old
dead rows they must be for very-infrequently-notified conditions.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jeff Boes | 2004-02-06 16:18:23 | Re: Contents of pg_listener linger? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-02-06 15:33:06 | Re: hanging for 30sec when checkpointing |