From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Jeff Boes <jboes(at)nexcerpt(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Contents of pg_listener linger? |
Date: | 2004-02-06 15:44:48 |
Message-ID: | 196.1076082288@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
Jeff Boes <jboes(at)nexcerpt(dot)com> writes:
> What causes the contents of pg_listener to "linger" long past the lifespan of
> the associated database backend? My table has rows that I know must be days old.
PG version?
I have a vague recollection of old bugs that prevented pg_listener rows
from being scavenged during backend exit, but they're all gone AFAIK.
The only remaining condition that would account for this is a crash of
the listening backend, but I trust that's not what you're dealing with.
In any case, if there is a row for a dead backend it should be removed
the first time someone tries to "notify" that condition name and
discovers that he can't signal the dead backend. If you've got days-old
dead rows they must be for very-infrequently-notified conditions.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jeff Boes | 2004-02-06 16:18:23 | Re: Contents of pg_listener linger? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-02-06 15:33:06 | Re: hanging for 30sec when checkpointing |