From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Ryan Kelly <rpkelly22(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Vik Reykja <vikreykja(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: hstore parser incorrectly handles malformed input |
Date: | 2012-04-27 14:22:11 |
Message-ID: | 19559.1335536531@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Ryan Kelly <rpkelly22(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> As long as we make it consistent on both sides of the '=>' (and document
> it, too), then I don't really care either way. Currently you have to use
> quotes to get an empty key, so I thought it natural to that you should
> have to quote to get an empty value.
> I've attached a modified version of Tom's patch which also allows empty
> keys.
Hm ... I don't agree that keys and values are interchangeable, and
I don't see that empty keys are a good thing (whereas empty values are
clearly a reasonable edge case). So I think this is going a bit far;
it seems to me it'd be giving up a lot of syntax-error detection
capability in return for some not-actually-helpful symmetry.
On the other hand, I seldom use hstore so I'm probably not the best
person to be judging the appropriateness of these options. Any other
votes out there?
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jeff Frost | 2012-04-27 16:07:46 | 9.1.3 backends getting stuck in 'startup' |
Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2012-04-27 14:16:04 | Re: BUG #6619: Misleading output from slave when host is not running |