| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Joshua Berry <yoberi(at)gmail(dot)com>, Postgresql General Mailing list <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Providing an alternative result when there is no result |
| Date: | 2009-05-19 23:00:23 |
| Message-ID: | 19550.1242774023@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 3:13 PM, Joshua Berry <yoberi(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> Is there an easy and efficient way to return a boolean false for a query
>> that returns no result, and true for one that does return a result?
> Probably the best general approach is to:
> select count(*) = 1 from
> (
> <query> limit 1
> )q;
Seems like EXISTS() is much more straightforward ...
> the point being that in some cases (not all obviously) the limit 1 can
> be a huge win, as you only care if there are rows or not.
... the system does know about optimizing EXISTS as if it were a LIMIT
query; you don't need to tack that on yourself.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jeffrey Trimble | 2009-05-19 23:08:10 | Re: Configure fails to find readline libraries |
| Previous Message | Scott Mead | 2009-05-19 22:56:12 | Re: Configure fails to find readline libraries |