Re: Performance monitor

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Karel Zak <zakkr(at)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz>, Denis Perchine <dyp(at)perchine(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Performance monitor
Date: 2001-03-13 16:01:07
Message-ID: 19549.984499267@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> My idea is that they can telnet into the server machine and do remote-X
> with the application. Just set the DISPLAY variable and it should work.

Remote X pretty well sucks in the real world. Aside from speed issues
there is the little problem of firewalls filtering out X connections.

If you've got ssh running then you can tunnel the X connection through
the ssh connection, which fixes the firewall problem, but it makes the
speed problem worse. And getting ssh plus X forwarding working is not
something I want to have to hassle with when my remote database is down.

If you are thinking of telnet-based remote admin then I suggest you get
out your curses man page and do up a curses GUI. (No smiley... I'd
seriously prefer that to something that depends on remote X.)

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Vadim Mikheev 2001-03-13 16:02:00 Re: RE: xlog loose ends, continued
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2001-03-13 15:56:58 Re: Performance monitor