| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | NikhilS <nikkhils(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Neil Conway" <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "Trevor Hardcastle" <chizu(at)spicious(dot)com>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: CREATE TABLE LIKE INCLUDING INDEXES support |
| Date: | 2007-06-03 14:48:21 |
| Message-ID: | 19542.1180882101@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
NikhilS <nikkhils(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On 6/3/07, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> This still seems to fundamentally misunderstand the difference between
>> an index and a constraint. IMHO it should not be examining pg_index
>> (or specifically, the index Relations) at all.
> Anyways, this patch and the functionality introduced herein will be useful
> in the "CREATE .. INCLUDING INDEXES" case too.
No doubt. But those are different features and we shouldn't confuse
'em; in particular not put behavior into the INCLUDING CONSTRAINTS case
that shouldn't be there.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-06-03 17:08:40 | pgsql: Create a GUC parameter temp_tablespaces that allows selection of |
| Previous Message | NikhilS | 2007-06-03 14:02:58 | Re: CREATE TABLE LIKE INCLUDING INDEXES support |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-06-03 17:42:07 | Re: GUC temp_tablespaces (updated) |
| Previous Message | NikhilS | 2007-06-03 14:02:58 | Re: CREATE TABLE LIKE INCLUDING INDEXES support |