Re: Ridicolus Postgresql review

From: "Bang, Steinar" <Steinar(dot)bang(at)tandbergtv(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Ridicolus Postgresql review
Date: 2001-09-12 11:22:09
Message-ID: 194F8BB4FDB2D311B4010008C733C77401594E69@no-mail.oslo.tandbergtv.lan
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Justin Clift wrote:

> So far the mistakes I have are :
>
> - "Both MySQL and PostgreSQL are multithreaded
> servers..."
>
> PostgreSQL is NOT a multi-threaded server. It
> is *no-where* claimed to be a multi-threaded
> server.

Hm... maybe you should clarify that this doesn't mean
that a PostgreSQL server is restricted to only handle
one request at a time?

This email, its content and any attachments is PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL to
TANDBERG Television. If received in error please notify the sender and
destroy the original message and attachments.

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message R Talbot 2001-09-12 11:23:50 Inheritance c.cities ??
Previous Message Andrey Y. Mosienko 2001-09-12 10:45:26 Change field only in trigger