From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Guillaume Smet" <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Greg Smith" <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: WIP patch - INSERT-able log statements |
Date: | 2007-02-20 04:11:44 |
Message-ID: | 19495.1171944704@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
"Guillaume Smet" <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> (each query is run on a different backend). With stderr you don't have
> sufficient information to know the query you should append the text
> to. Syslog adds useful context information (pid, command line, command
> number) which allows you to guarantee the consistency.
> It's a real problem for us and that's why I don't recommend using
> stderr when you use pgFouine.
Of course, the other side of that coin is that syslog is known to drop
messages altogether under sufficient load. (At least on some platforms;
dunno about yours.)
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2007-02-20 04:34:23 | Re: WIP patch - INSERT-able log statements |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-02-20 04:09:40 | Re: [PATCHES] WIP patch - INSERT-able log statements |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2007-02-20 04:34:23 | Re: WIP patch - INSERT-able log statements |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-02-20 04:09:40 | Re: [PATCHES] WIP patch - INSERT-able log statements |