Re: [PATCHES] Users/Groups -> Roles

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Users/Groups -> Roles
Date: 2005-06-30 15:48:07
Message-ID: 19492.1120146487@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> writes:
> That's controlled by pg_hba.conf though, isn't it? The idea being that
> you'd like to give some people the ability to create users/roles, but to
> limit the databases those created users/roles could connect to by, say,
> requiring they have 'usage' or 'connect' permissions to that database,
> which could be set by the database owner; without the database owner
> having write permissions to the pg_hba.conf.

You can do that today by putting a group name in pg_hba.conf. Roles
will make it more flexible; I don't see that we need anything more.

For instance, if pg_hba.conf says "samegroup" then you could manage
everything by associating a group with each database.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2005-06-30 15:49:59 Re: [PATCHES] Users/Groups -> Roles
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2005-06-30 15:44:44 Re: [PATCHES] Users/Groups -> Roles

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2005-06-30 15:49:59 Re: [PATCHES] Users/Groups -> Roles
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2005-06-30 15:44:44 Re: [PATCHES] Users/Groups -> Roles