Re: string_agg delimiter having no effect with order by

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: string_agg delimiter having no effect with order by
Date: 2010-08-04 15:29:39
Message-ID: 19470.1280935779@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Oh, yeah. I guess you need this:

> select thing, string_agg(stuff, ',' order by stuff) from agg_test
> group by thing;

> Rather than this:

> select thing, string_agg(stuff order by stuff, ',') from agg_test
> group by thing;

> It's all kinds of not obvious to me what the second one is supposed to
> mean, but I remember this was discussed before. Perhaps we need a
> <note> somewhere about multi-argument aggregates.

Done:

+ <para>
+ When dealing with multiple-argument aggregate functions, note that the
+ <literal>ORDER BY</> clause goes after all the aggregate arguments.
+ For example, this:
+ <programlisting>
+ SELECT string_agg(a, ',' ORDER BY a) FROM table;
+ </programlisting>
+ not this:
+ <programlisting>
+ SELECT string_agg(a ORDER BY a, ',') FROM table; -- not what you want
+ </programlisting>
+ The latter syntax will be accepted, but <literal>','</> will be
+ treated as a (useless) sort key.
+ </para>

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2010-08-04 16:37:23 Re: In 8.2, shutdown wrongly caused automatic restart
Previous Message Shine 2010-08-04 14:53:02 BUG #5598: Compatibility modes

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua Tolley 2010-08-04 16:17:35 Re: GROUPING SETS revisited
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2010-08-04 15:26:30 Re: merge command - GSoC progress