Re: [HACKERS] Are we losing momentum?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Sean Chittenden <sean(at)chittenden(dot)org>
Cc: Curt Sampson <cjs(at)cynic(dot)net>, Brent Verner <brent(at)rcfile(dot)org>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Are we losing momentum?
Date: 2003-04-16 16:26:58
Message-ID: 19469.1050510418@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-general pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Sean Chittenden <sean(at)chittenden(dot)org> writes:
> 4) guc.c is now in sync with the list of available variables used for
> tab completion
>>
>> AFAIK, the GUC variables not listed in tab-complete.c were omitted
>> deliberately. We could have a discussion about the sensefulness of
>> those decisions, but please do not consider it a bug to be fixed
>> out-of-hand.

> Alright, there weren't many omitted GUC's, but those that were
> omitted did have counterparts that were include already so I figured
> there was some bit rot going on.

There could be some of that too. I was just saying that it's not a
foregone conclusion to me that every parameter known to guc.c should
be in the tab completion list.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2003-04-16 16:32:23 Novice needs help in Portuguese-BR
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2003-04-16 16:20:31 Now we need French help

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruno Wolff III 2003-04-16 16:50:29 Re: calculating time
Previous Message Jonathan Bartlett 2003-04-16 16:24:30 Re: high availability

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rob Butler 2003-04-16 16:39:58 Re: cross-db queries (was Are we losing momentum?)
Previous Message Jonathan Bartlett 2003-04-16 16:24:30 Re: high availability

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2003-04-16 17:47:18 Re: [PATCHES] the build
Previous Message Barry Lind 2003-04-16 16:25:47 Re: [PATCHES] the build