| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | akschoenberger(at)gmail(dot)com |
| Cc: | pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: BUG #17824: PQTRANS_ACTIVE misleading |
| Date: | 2023-03-08 16:22:19 |
| Message-ID: | 194319.1678292539@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
PG Bug reporting form <noreply(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
> The documentation for PQTRANS_ACTIVE [1] does not make explicitly clear that
> it is returned in *all* cases where there is a command in progress on an
> okay connection, and not just in the case that there is a command in
> progress inside of a transaction [2]. With a name like PQTRANS_ACTIVE, I
> believe it is worth making clear that it can happen when a transaction is
> not active.
The existing documentation defines it as "a command is in progress",
which seems perfectly clear to me --- adding more words would just
muddy the waters.
Also, if a command is running then the server *does* have a transaction
open -- it might be an auto-started, auto-committed one, but there's
always a transaction. You seem to be using that word in a way that does
not correspond with common Postgres usage. (Note that the definitions for
PQTRANS_INTRANS and PQTRANS_INERROR say "transaction block" not
"transaction", to comport with our usual terminology.)
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alexander Lakhin | 2023-03-08 20:00:00 | Re: BUG #17368: Assert failed in GetSafeSnapshot() for SERIALIZABLE READ ONLY DEFERRABLE transaction |
| Previous Message | David G. Johnston | 2023-03-08 16:22:07 | Re: BUG #17824: PQTRANS_ACTIVE misleading |