Re: snowball release

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: snowball release
Date: 2020-06-08 15:19:25
Message-ID: 1942969.1591629565@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> writes:
> On 8 Jun 2020, at 16:33, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Hm, I don't see any documentation change in that commit --- don't
>> we have (at least) a list of the stemmers somewhere in the SGML docs?

> IIRC we refer to the Snowball site, and only have a list in the \dFd output,
> but that can be argued to be an example and not expected to be updated to
> match. Perhaps we should though?

Looking in the commit logs, our past updates 7b925e127 and
fd582317e just updated that \dFd sample. So I guess that's the
minimum expectation. Maybe we should think about having a more
formal list in the actual Snowball section (12.6.6)?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2020-06-08 15:27:26 Re: should CREATE INDEX ON partitioned_table call PreventInTransactionBlock() ?
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2020-06-08 14:49:00 Re: BufFileRead() error signalling