Re: WAL recycling, Linux 2.4.18

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Doug Fields <dfields-pg-general(at)pexicom(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, Glenn Stone <gstone(at)pogolinux(dot)com>
Subject: Re: WAL recycling, Linux 2.4.18
Date: 2002-07-08 19:26:47
Message-ID: 19425.1026156407@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Doug Fields <dfields-pg-general(at)pexicom(dot)com> writes:
> (gdb) where
> #0 0x4028299d in fdatasync () from /lib/libc.so.6
> #1 0x081049ae in pg_fdatasync (fd=53) at fd.c:233
> #2 0x08088276 in issue_xlog_fsync () at xlog.c:3367

Hmm. That leads to a different line of thought about where the problem
is. Does the problem go away if you turn off fsync, or select a
wal_sync_method other than fdatasync? (See postgresql.conf; not sure
if you need a postmaster restart or just SIGHUP to change these.)

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-07-08 19:30:20 Re: WAL recycling, Linux 2.4.18
Previous Message Doug Fields 2002-07-08 19:22:02 Re: WAL recycling, Linux 2.4.18