Re: Why we need to check for local buffers in BufferIsExclusiveLocked and BufferIsDirty?

From: Srinath Reddy Sadipiralla <srinath(dot)reddy(at)zohocorp(dot)com>
To: "pgsql-hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Why we need to check for local buffers in BufferIsExclusiveLocked and BufferIsDirty?
Date: 2024-12-09 05:09:35
Message-ID: 193a9d2a981.d32b5f0730162.4362483220557140648@zohocorp.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

---- On Sun, 08 Dec 2024 18:23:21 +0530 Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote ---

Hi Srinath,

On Sat, 7 Dec 2024 at 11:17, Srinath Reddy Sadipiralla
<mailto:srinath(dot)reddy(at)zohocorp(dot)com> wrote:
> > ---- On Fri, 06 Dec 2024 16:40:51 +0530 Nazir Bilal Yavuz <mailto:byavuz81(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote ---
> > LGTM.
>
> sorry i didn't get,what you meant to say is the assert failure which i said is correct and does my patch to this looks good?🤔

Sorry if I was not clear. Yes, I wanted to say what you said is
correct and the patch looks good to me.

--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Srinath Reddy Sadipiralla 2024-12-09 05:10:35 Fwd: Re: Why we need to check for local buffers in BufferIsExclusiveLocked and BufferIsDirty?
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2024-12-09 04:50:00 Re: Disallow UPDATE/DELETE on table with unpublished generated column as REPLICA IDENTITY